Filtered by vendor Microchip
Subscribe
Total
35 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-22216 | 1 Microchip | 1 Maxview Storage Manager | 2024-02-15 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| In default installations of Microchip maxView Storage Manager (for Adaptec Smart Storage Controllers) where Redfish server is configured for remote system management, unauthorized access can occur, with data modification and information disclosure. This affects 3.00.23484 through 4.14.00.26064 (except for the patched versions 3.07.23980 and 4.07.00.25339). | |||||
| CVE-2023-51438 | 2 Microchip, Siemens | 4 Maxview Storage Manager, Simatic Ipc1047e, Simatic Ipc647e and 1 more | 2024-01-16 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC IPC1047E (All versions with maxView Storage Manager < V4.14.00.26068 on Windows), SIMATIC IPC647E (All versions with maxView Storage Manager < V4.14.00.26068 on Windows), SIMATIC IPC847E (All versions with maxView Storage Manager < V4.14.00.26068 on Windows). In default installations of maxView Storage Manager where Redfish® server is configured for remote system management, a vulnerability has been identified that can provide unauthorized access. | |||||
| CVE-2023-23588 | 2 Microchip, Siemens | 10 Maxview Storage Manager, Simatic Ipc1047, Simatic Ipc1047 Firmware and 7 more | 2024-01-11 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC IPC1047 (All versions), SIMATIC IPC1047E (All versions with maxView Storage Manager < 4.09.00.25611 on Windows), SIMATIC IPC647D (All versions), SIMATIC IPC647E (All versions with maxView Storage Manager < 4.09.00.25611 on Windows), SIMATIC IPC847D (All versions), SIMATIC IPC847E (All versions with maxView Storage Manager < 4.09.00.25611 on Windows). The Adaptec Maxview application on affected devices is using a non-unique TLS certificate across installations to protect the communication from the local browser to the local application. A local attacker may use this key to decrypt intercepted local traffic between the browser and the application and could perform a man-in-the-middle attack in order to modify data in transit. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27636 | 1 Microchip | 1 Mplab Network Creator | 2023-10-13 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| In Microchip MPLAB Net 3.6.1, TCP ISNs are improperly random. | |||||
| CVE-2022-40480 | 2 Microchip, Nordicsemi | 4 Dt100112, Dt100112 Firmware, Nrf5340-dk and 1 more | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Nordic Semiconductor, Microchip Technology NRF5340-DK DT100112 was discovered to contain an issue which allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted ConReq packet. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45190 | 1 Microchip | 2 Rn4870, Rn4870 Firmware | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered on Microchip RN4870 1.43 devices. An attacker within BLE radio range can bypass passkey entry in the legacy pairing of the device. | |||||
| CVE-2022-46399 | 1 Microchip | 28 Bm64, Bm64 Firmware, Bm70 and 25 more | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Microchip RN4870 module firmware 1.43 (and the Microchip PIC LightBlue Explorer Demo 4.2 DT100112) is unresponsive with ConReqTimeoutZero. | |||||
| CVE-2022-46400 | 1 Microchip | 18 Bm70, Bm70 Firmware, Bm71 and 15 more | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Microchip RN4870 module firmware 1.43 (and the Microchip PIC LightBlue Explorer Demo 4.2 DT100112) allows attackers to bypass passkey entry in legacy pairing. | |||||
| CVE-2022-40022 | 1 Microchip | 2 Syncserver S650, Syncserver S650 Firmware | 2023-06-14 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Microchip Technology (Microsemi) SyncServer S650 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45192 | 1 Microchip | 2 Rn4870, Rn4870 Firmware | 2023-02-16 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered on Microchip RN4870 1.43 devices. An attacker within BLE radio range can cause a denial of service by sending a cleartext encryption pause request. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45191 | 1 Microchip | 2 Rn4870, Rn4870 Firmware | 2023-02-16 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered on Microchip RN4870 1.43 devices. An attacker within BLE radio range can cause a denial of service by sending a pair confirm message with wrong values. | |||||
| CVE-2022-46401 | 1 Microchip | 24 Bm64, Bm64 Firmware, Bm70 and 21 more | 2022-12-27 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Microchip RN4870 module firmware 1.43 (and the Microchip PIC LightBlue Explorer Demo 4.2 DT100112) accepts PauseEncReqPlainText before pairing is complete. | |||||
| CVE-2022-46402 | 1 Microchip | 18 Bm70, Bm70 Firmware, Bm71 and 15 more | 2022-12-27 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Microchip RN4870 module firmware 1.43 (and the Microchip PIC LightBlue Explorer Demo 4.2 DT100112) accepts PairCon_rmSend with incorrect values. | |||||
| CVE-2022-46403 | 1 Microchip | 18 Bm70, Bm70 Firmware, Bm71 and 15 more | 2022-12-27 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH |
| The Microchip RN4870 module firmware 1.43 (and the Microchip PIC LightBlue Explorer Demo 4.2 DT100112) mishandles reject messages. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37604 | 1 Microchip | 1 Miwi | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In version 6.5 of Microchip MiWi software and all previous versions including legacy products, there is a possibility of frame counters being validated/updated prior to the message authentication. With this vulnerability in place, an attacker may increment the incoming frame counter values by injecting messages with a sufficiently large frame counter value and invalid payload. This results in denial of service/valid packets in the network. There is also a possibility of a replay attack in the stack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37605 | 1 Microchip | 1 Miwi | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In version 6.5 Microchip MiWi software and all previous versions including legacy products, the stack is validating only two out of four Message Integrity Check (MIC) bytes. | |||||
| CVE-2020-20950 | 5 Apple, Ietf, Linux and 2 more | 5 Macos, Public Key Cryptography Standards \#1, Linux Kernel and 2 more | 2021-09-08 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Bleichenbacher's attack on PKCS #1 v1.5 padding for RSA in Microchip Libraries for Applications 2018-11-26 All up to 2018-11-26. The vulnerability can allow one to use Bleichenbacher's oracle attack to decrypt an encrypted ciphertext by making successive queries to the server using the vulnerable library, resulting in remote information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9034 | 1 Microchip | 10 Syncserver S100, Syncserver S100 Firmware, Syncserver S200 and 7 more | 2021-07-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Symmetricom SyncServer S100 2.90.70.3, S200 1.30, S250 1.25, S300 2.65.0, and S350 2.80.1 devices mishandle session validation, leading to unauthenticated creation, modification, or elimination of users. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15809 | 5 Athena-scs, Cryptsoft, Microchip and 2 more | 5 Idprotect, S\/a Idflex V, Atmel Toolbox and 2 more | 2021-04-13 | 1.2 LOW | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| Smart cards from the Athena SCS manufacturer, based on the Atmel Toolbox 00.03.11.05 and the AT90SC chip, contain a timing side channel in ECDSA signature generation. This allows a local attacker, able to measure the duration of hundreds to thousands of signing operations, to compute the private key used. The issue occurs because the Atmel Toolbox 00.03.11.05 contains two versions of ECDSA signature functions, described as fast and secure, but the affected cards chose to use the fast version, which leaks the bit length of the random nonce via timing. This affects Athena IDProtect 010b.0352.0005, Athena IDProtect 010e.1245.0002, Athena IDProtect 0106.0130.0401, Athena IDProtect 010e.1245.0002, Valid S/A IDflex V 010b.0352.0005, SafeNet eToken 4300 010e.1245.0002, TecSec Armored Card 010e.0264.0001, and TecSec Armored Card 108.0264.0001. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17441 | 2 Altran, Microchip | 2 Picotcp, Mplab Harmony | 2020-12-14 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The code for processing the IPv6 headers does not validate whether the IPv6 payload length field is equal to the actual size of the payload, which leads to an Out-of-Bounds read during the ICMPv6 checksum calculation, resulting in either Denial-of-Service or Information Disclosure. This affects pico_ipv6_extension_headers and pico_checksum_adder (in pico_ipv6.c and pico_frame.c). | |||||