Total
56 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-5528 | 2 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes | 2 Fedora, Kubernetes | 2024-01-19 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods and persistent volumes on Windows nodes may be able to escalate to admin privileges on those nodes. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they are using an in-tree storage plugin for Windows nodes. | |||||
| CVE-2023-3955 | 2 Kubernetes, Microsoft | 2 Kubernetes, Windows | 2023-12-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods on Windows nodes may be able to escalate to admin privileges on those nodes. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they include Windows nodes. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25736 | 2 Kubernetes, Microsoft | 2 Kubernetes, Windows | 2023-12-21 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| Kube-proxy on Windows can unintentionally forward traffic to local processes listening on the same port (“spec.ports[*].port”) as a LoadBalancer Service when the LoadBalancer controller does not set the “status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip” field. Clusters where the LoadBalancer controller sets the “status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip” field are unaffected. | |||||
| CVE-2023-3676 | 2 Kubernetes, Microsoft | 2 Kubernetes, Windows | 2023-11-30 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods on Windows nodes may be able to escalate to admin privileges on those nodes. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they include Windows nodes. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8555 | 2 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes | 2 Fedora, Kubernetes | 2023-11-07 | 3.5 LOW | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| The Kubernetes kube-controller-manager in versions v1.0-1.14, versions prior to v1.15.12, v1.16.9, v1.17.5, and version v1.18.0 are vulnerable to a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) that allows certain authorized users to leak up to 500 bytes of arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints within the master's host network (such as link-local or loopback services). | |||||
| CVE-2020-8554 | 2 Kubernetes, Oracle | 4 Kubernetes, Communications Cloud Native Core Network Slice Selection Function, Communications Cloud Native Core Policy and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| Kubernetes API server in all versions allow an attacker who is able to create a ClusterIP service and set the spec.externalIPs field, to intercept traffic to that IP address. Additionally, an attacker who is able to patch the status (which is considered a privileged operation and should not typically be granted to users) of a LoadBalancer service can set the status.loadBalancer.ingress.ip to similar effect. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8552 | 2 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes | 2 Fedora, Kubernetes | 2023-11-07 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Kubernetes API server component in versions prior to 1.15.9, 1.16.0-1.16.6, and 1.17.0-1.17.2 has been found to be vulnerable to a denial of service attack via successful API requests. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8551 | 2 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes | 2 Fedora, Kubernetes | 2023-11-07 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Kubelet component in versions 1.15.0-1.15.9, 1.16.0-1.16.6, and 1.17.0-1.17.2 has been found to be vulnerable to a denial of service attack via the kubelet API, including the unauthenticated HTTP read-only API typically served on port 10255, and the authenticated HTTPS API typically served on port 10250. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9946 | 3 Cncf, Kubernetes, Netapp | 3 Portmap, Kubernetes, Cloud Insights | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) CNI (Container Networking Interface) 0.7.4 has a network firewall misconfiguration which affects Kubernetes. The CNI 'portmap' plugin, used to setup HostPorts for CNI, inserts rules at the front of the iptables nat chains; which take precedence over the KUBE- SERVICES chain. Because of this, the HostPort/portmap rule could match incoming traffic even if there were better fitting, more specific service definition rules like NodePorts later in the chain. The issue is fixed in CNI 0.7.5 and Kubernetes 1.11.9, 1.12.7, 1.13.5, and 1.14.0. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11253 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 2 Kubernetes, Openshift Container Platform | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Improper input validation in the Kubernetes API server in versions v1.0-1.12 and versions prior to v1.13.12, v1.14.8, v1.15.5, and v1.16.2 allows authorized users to send malicious YAML or JSON payloads, causing the API server to consume excessive CPU or memory, potentially crashing and becoming unavailable. Prior to v1.14.0, default RBAC policy authorized anonymous users to submit requests that could trigger this vulnerability. Clusters upgraded from a version prior to v1.14.0 keep the more permissive policy by default for backwards compatibility. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11246 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Kubernetes | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The kubectl cp command allows copying files between containers and the user machine. To copy files from a container, Kubernetes runs tar inside the container to create a tar archive, copies it over the network, and kubectl unpacks it on the user’s machine. If the tar binary in the container is malicious, it could run any code and output unexpected, malicious results. An attacker could use this to write files to any path on the user’s machine when kubectl cp is called, limited only by the system permissions of the local user. Kubernetes affected versions include versions prior to 1.12.9, versions prior to 1.13.6, versions prior to 1.14.2, and versions 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1002101 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 2 Kubernetes, Openshift Container Platform | 2023-11-07 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The kubectl cp command allows copying files between containers and the user machine. To copy files from a container, Kubernetes creates a tar inside the container, copies it over the network, and kubectl unpacks it on the user’s machine. If the tar binary in the container is malicious, it could run any code and output unexpected, malicious results. An attacker could use this to write files to any path on the user’s machine when kubectl cp is called, limited only by the system permissions of the local user. The untar function can both create and follow symbolic links. The issue is resolved in kubectl v1.11.9, v1.12.7, v1.13.5, and v1.14.0. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1002100 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 2 Kubernetes, Openshift Container Platform | 2023-11-07 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In all Kubernetes versions prior to v1.11.8, v1.12.6, and v1.13.4, users that are authorized to make patch requests to the Kubernetes API Server can send a specially crafted patch of type "json-patch" (e.g. `kubectl patch --type json` or `"Content-Type: application/json-patch+json"`) that consumes excessive resources while processing, causing a Denial of Service on the API Server. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1002105 | 3 Kubernetes, Netapp, Redhat | 3 Kubernetes, Trident, Openshift Container Platform | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In all Kubernetes versions prior to v1.10.11, v1.11.5, and v1.12.3, incorrect handling of error responses to proxied upgrade requests in the kube-apiserver allowed specially crafted requests to establish a connection through the Kubernetes API server to backend servers, then send arbitrary requests over the same connection directly to the backend, authenticated with the Kubernetes API server's TLS credentials used to establish the backend connection. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1002102 | 2 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes | 2 Fedora, Kubernetes | 2023-11-07 | 2.1 LOW | 2.6 LOW |
| Improper validation of URL redirection in the Kubernetes API server in versions prior to v1.14.0 allows an attacker-controlled Kubelet to redirect API server requests from streaming endpoints to arbitrary hosts. Impacted API servers will follow the redirect as a GET request with client-certificate credentials for authenticating to the Kubelet. | |||||
| CVE-2023-2728 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Kubernetes | 2023-08-03 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Users may be able to launch containers that bypass the mountable secrets policy enforced by the ServiceAccount admission plugin when using ephemeral containers. The policy ensures pods running with a service account may only reference secrets specified in the service account’s secrets field. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if the ServiceAccount admission plugin and the `kubernetes.io/enforce-mountable-secrets` annotation are used together with ephemeral containers. | |||||
| CVE-2023-2727 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Kubernetes | 2023-08-03 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Users may be able to launch containers using images that are restricted by ImagePolicyWebhook when using ephemeral containers. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if the ImagePolicyWebhook admission plugin is used together with ephemeral containers. | |||||
| CVE-2023-2431 | 2 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes | 2 Fedora, Kubernetes | 2023-07-01 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubelet that allows pods to bypass the seccomp profile enforcement. Pods that use localhost type for seccomp profile but specify an empty profile field, are affected by this issue. In this scenario, this vulnerability allows the pod to run in unconfined (seccomp disabled) mode. This bug affects Kubelet. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25735 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Kubernetes | 2023-06-26 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A security issue was discovered in kube-apiserver that could allow node updates to bypass a Validating Admission Webhook. Clusters are only affected by this vulnerability if they run a Validating Admission Webhook for Nodes that denies admission based at least partially on the old state of the Node object. Validating Admission Webhook does not observe some previous fields. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25749 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Kubernetes | 2023-06-01 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Windows workloads can run as ContainerAdministrator even when those workloads set the runAsNonRoot option to true. | |||||