Filtered by vendor Ibm
Subscribe
Total
7009 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-20477 | 1 Ibm | 1 Planning Analytics | 2021-06-30 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 196949. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20490 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Spectrum Protect Plus, Linux Kernel | 2021-06-30 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0 through 10.1.8 could allow a local user to cause a denial of service due to insecure file permission settings. IBM X-Force ID: 197791. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20580 | 1 Ibm | 1 Planning Analytics | 2021-06-30 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 could be vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 198241. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4609 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Verify Privilege Manager | 2021-06-29 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Sevret Server (IBM Security Verify Privilege Manager 10.8.2) is vulnerable to a buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A local attacker could overflow a buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system or cause the system to crash. IBM X-Force ID: 184917. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20413 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Encryption | 2021-06-29 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Guardium Data Encryption (GDE) 4.0.0.4 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 196212. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20494 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Identity Manager Adapter | 2021-06-29 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Identity Manager Adapters 6.0 and 7.0 are vulnerable to a heap based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds. An authenticared user could overflow the buffer and cause the service to crash. IBM X-Force ID: 197882. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29706 | 1 Ibm | 1 Aix | 2021-06-22 | 3.6 LOW | 7.1 HIGH |
| IBM AIX 7.1 could allow a non-privileged local user to exploit a vulnerability in the trace facility to expose sensitive information or cause a denial of service. IBM X-Force ID: 200663. | |||||
| CVE-2004-1663 | 5 Broadcom, Brocade, Engenio and 2 more | 6 Fabric Operating System, Silkworm, Silkworm Fiber Channel Switch and 3 more | 2021-06-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Engenio/LSI Logic storage controllers, as used in products such as Storagetek D280, and IBM DS4100 (formerly FastT 100) and Brocade SilkWorm Switches, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (freeze and possible data corruption) via crafted TCP packets. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20483 | 4 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 5 Aix, Security Identity Manager, Linux Kernel and 2 more | 2021-06-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 197591. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20566 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Resilient Security Orchestration Automation And Response, Linux | 2021-06-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Resilient SOAR V38.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 199238. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5003 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager | 2021-06-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 192956. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20396 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Qradar Analyst Workflow | 2021-06-21 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| IBM QRadar Analyst Workflow App 1.0 through 1.18.0 for IBM QRadar SIEM allows web pages to be stored locally which can be read by another user on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 196009. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20567 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Resilient Security Orchestration Automation And Response, Linux | 2021-06-21 | 2.1 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Resilient SOAR V38.0 could allow a local privileged attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper or nonexisting encryption.IBM X-Force ID: 199239. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3956 | 3 Ibm, Nodejs, Npmjs | 3 Sdk, Node.js, Npm | 2021-06-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The CLI in npm before 2.15.1 and 3.x before 3.8.3, as used in Node.js 0.10 before 0.10.44, 0.12 before 0.12.13, 4 before 4.4.2, and 5 before 5.10.0, includes bearer tokens with arbitrary requests, which allows remote HTTP servers to obtain sensitive information by reading Authorization headers. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20487 | 1 Ibm | 18 8335-gth, 8335-gtx, 9008-22l and 15 more | 2021-06-14 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| IBM Power9 Self Boot Engine(SBE) could allow a privileged user to inject malicious code and compromise the integrity of the host firmware bypassing the host firmware signature verification process. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20380 | 1 Ibm | 1 Qradar Advisor With Watson | 2021-06-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM QRadar Advisor With Watson App 1.1 through 2.5 as used on IBM QRadar SIEM 7.4 could allow a remote user to obtain sensitive information from HTTP requests that could aid in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 195712. | |||||
| CVE-2014-4806 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Appscan, Linux Kernel | 2021-06-11 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The installation process in IBM Security AppScan Enterprise 8.x before 8.6.0.2 iFix 003, 8.7.x before 8.7.0.1 iFix 003, 8.8.x before 8.8.0.1 iFix 002, and 9.0.x before 9.0.0.1 iFix 001 on Linux places a cleartext password in a temporary file, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading this file. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5008 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datapower Gateway | 2021-06-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.1.0 and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.14 stores sensitive information in GET request parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 193033. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20517 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server Nd | 2021-06-10 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server Network Deployment 8.5 and 9.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to traverse directories. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to read and delete arbitrary files on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 198435. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9879 | 2 Ibm, Vmware | 2 Websphere Application Server, Spring Security | 2021-06-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Security before 3.2.10, 4.1.x before 4.1.4, and 4.2.x before 4.2.1. Spring Security does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with an encoded "/" to a request, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification. Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value returned for getPathInfo() and some do not. Spring Security uses the value returned by getPathInfo() as part of the process of mapping requests to security constraints. The unexpected presence of path parameters can cause a constraint to be bypassed. Users of Apache Tomcat (all current versions) are not affected by this vulnerability since Tomcat follows the guidance previously provided by the Servlet Expert group and strips path parameters from the value returned by getContextPath(), getServletPath(), and getPathInfo(). Users of other Servlet containers based on Apache Tomcat may or may not be affected depending on whether or not the handling of path parameters has been modified. Users of IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.x are known to be affected. Users of other containers that implement the Servlet specification may be affected. | |||||