Total
372 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-27270 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2021-04-01 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.0.37527. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of JPEG2000 images. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12230. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27860 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2021-03-26 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.1.35811. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of XFA templates. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11727. | |||||
| CVE-2018-18689 | 13 Apple, Avanquest, Foxitsoftware and 10 more | 20 Macos, Expert Pdf Ultimate, Pdf Experte Ultimate and 17 more | 2021-01-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The Portable Document Format (PDF) specification does not provide any information regarding the concrete procedure of how to validate signatures. Consequently, a Signature Wrapping vulnerability exists in multiple products. An attacker can use /ByteRange and xref manipulations that are not detected by the signature-validation logic. This affects Foxit Reader before 9.4 and PhantomPDF before 8.3.9 and 9.x before 9.4. It also affects eXpert PDF 12 Ultimate, Expert PDF Reader, Nitro Pro, Nitro Reader, PDF Architect 6, PDF Editor 6 Pro, PDF Experte 9 Ultimate, PDFelement6 Pro, PDF Studio Viewer 2018, PDF Studio Pro, PDF-XChange Editor and Viewer, Perfect PDF 10 Premium, Perfect PDF Reader, Soda PDF, and Soda PDF Desktop. | |||||
| CVE-2018-18688 | 11 Apple, Code-industry, Foxitsoftware and 8 more | 16 Macos, Master Pdf Editor, Foxit Reader and 13 more | 2021-01-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The Portable Document Format (PDF) specification does not provide any information regarding the concrete procedure of how to validate signatures. Consequently, an Incremental Saving vulnerability exists in multiple products. When an attacker uses the Incremental Saving feature to add pages or annotations, Body Updates are displayed to the user without any action by the signature-validation logic. This affects Foxit Reader before 9.4 and PhantomPDF before 8.3.9 and 9.x before 9.4. It also affects LibreOffice, Master PDF Editor, Nitro Pro, Nitro Reader, Nuance Power PDF Standard, PDF Editor 6 Pro, PDFelement6 Pro, PDF Studio Viewer 2018, PDF Studio Pro, Perfect PDF 10 Premium, and Perfect PDF Reader. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28203 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2020-12-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF 10.1.0.37527 and earlier. There is a null pointer access/dereference while opening a crafted PDF file, leading the application to crash (denial of service). | |||||
| CVE-2018-9958 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2020-11-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Text Annotations. When setting the point attribute, the process does not properly validate the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5620. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14425 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2020-11-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 10.0 allows Remote Command Execution via the app.opencPDFWebPage JavsScript API. An attacker can execute local files and bypass the security dialog. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17417 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2020-10-19 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.1.35811. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11657. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17416 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2020-10-19 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.0.35798. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of JPEG2000 images. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11497. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6752 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2020-10-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.3.10826. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF documents. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-7620. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17410 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2020-10-15 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.0.0.35798. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of GIF files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11135. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17414 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2020-10-15 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.0.35798. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the configuration files used by the Foxit Reader Update Service. The issue results from incorrect permissions set on a resource used by the service. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-11229. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17415 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2020-10-15 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.0.0.35798. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the configuration files used by the Foxit PhantomPDF Update Service. The issue results from incorrect permissions set on a resource used by the service. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-11308. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26537 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2020-10-05 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1. In a certain Shading calculation, the number of outputs is unequal to the number of color components in a color space. This causes an out-of-bounds write. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26535 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2020-10-05 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1. If TslAlloc attempts to allocate thread local storage but obtains an unacceptable index value, V8 throws an exception that leads to a write access violation (and read access violation). | |||||
| CVE-2020-26534 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2020-10-05 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1. There is an Opt object use-after-free related to Field::ClearItems and Field::DeleteOptions, during AcroForm JavaScript execution. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26539 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2020-10-05 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1. When there is a multiple interpretation error for /V (in the Additional Action and Field dictionaries), a use-after-free can occur with resultant remote code execution (or an information leak). | |||||
| CVE-2020-26536 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2020-10-02 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1. There is a NULL pointer dereference via a crafted PDF document. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10479 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2020-09-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of U3D Key Frame structures. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5399. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10478 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2020-09-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of U3D Texture Coord Dimensions objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5397. | |||||