Filtered by vendor Pulsesecure
Subscribe
Total
97 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-8204 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R5 on the PSAL Page. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8220 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R8 that allows an authenticated attacker to perform command injection via the administrator web which can cause DOS. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8221 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R8 which allows an authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files via the administrator web interface. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44720 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Ivanti Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 9.1R12, the administrator password is stored in the HTML source code of the "Maintenance > Push Configuration > Targets > Target Name" targets.cgi screen. A read-only administrative user can escalate to a read-write administrative role. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6320 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-02-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability has been discovered in login.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.1RX before 8.1R12 and 8.3RX before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.2RX before 5.2R9 and 5.4RX before 5.4R2 wherein an http(s) Host header received from the browser is trusted without validation. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4788 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.2 before 8.2r1, 8.1 before 8.1r2, 8.0 before 8.0r10, and 7.4 before 7.4r13.4 allow remote attackers to read an unspecified system file via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11542 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-02-27 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can send a specially crafted message resulting in a stack buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4787 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.2 before 8.2r1, 8.1 before 8.1r2, 8.0 before 8.0r10, and 7.4 before 7.4r13.4 allow remote attackers to read sensitive system authentication files in an unspecified directory via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8217 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R8 allowed attackers to exploit in the URL used for Citrix ICA. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8222 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R8 that allowed an authenticated attacker via the administrator web interface to perform an arbitrary file reading vulnerability through Meeting. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14366 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-02-27 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| download.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 8.1RX before 8.1R13 and 8.3RX before 8.3R4 and Pulse Policy Secure through 5.2RX before 5.2R10 and 5.4RX before 5.4R4 have an Open Redirect Vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2018-18284 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 11 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 8 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors involving the 1Policy operator. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16513 | 4 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 5 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 2 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use a type confusion in the setcolor function to crash the interpreter or possibly have unspecified other impact. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15911 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 11 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 8 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 before 2018-08-24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript could use uninitialized memory access in the aesdecode operator to crash the interpreter or potentially execute code. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15910 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 9 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 6 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use a type confusion in the LockDistillerParams parameter to crash the interpreter or execute code. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15909 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 11 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 8 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 before 2018-08-24, a type confusion using the .shfill operator could be used by attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files to crash the interpreter or potentially execute code. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0799 | 2 Openssl, Pulsesecure | 3 Openssl, Client, Steel Belted Radius | 2023-11-07 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The fmtstr function in crypto/bio/b_print.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g improperly calculates string lengths, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (overflow and out-of-bounds read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long string, as demonstrated by a large amount of ASN.1 data, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-2842. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13162 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Secure Desktop Client, Pulse Secure Installer Service | 2023-03-01 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| A time-of-check time-of-use vulnerability in PulseSecureService.exe in Pulse Secure Client versions prior to 9.1.6 down to 5.3 R70 for Windows (which runs as NT AUTHORITY/SYSTEM) allows unprivileged users to run a Microsoft Installer executable with elevated privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0800 | 2 Openssl, Pulsesecure | 3 Openssl, Client, Steel Belted Radius | 2022-12-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The SSLv2 protocol, as used in OpenSSL before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g and other products, requires a server to send a ServerVerify message before establishing that a client possesses certain plaintext RSA data, which makes it easier for remote attackers to decrypt TLS ciphertext data by leveraging a Bleichenbacher RSA padding oracle, aka a "DROWN" attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31922 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Virtual Traffic Manager | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability in Pulse Secure Virtual Traffic Manager before 21.1 could allow an attacker to smuggle an HTTP request through an HTTP/2 Header. This vulnerability is resolved in 21.1, 20.3R1, 20.2R1, 20.1R2, 19.2R4, and 18.2R3. | |||||