Filtered by vendor Eclipse
Subscribe
Total
162 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-12544 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Vert.x | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In version from 3.5.Beta1 to 3.5.3 of Eclipse Vert.x, the OpenAPI XML type validator creates XML parsers without taking appropriate defense against XML attacks. This mechanism is exclusively when the developer uses the Eclipse Vert.x OpenAPI XML type validator to validate a provided schema. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12542 | 2 Eclipse, Microsoft | 2 Vert.x, Windows | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In version from 3.0.0 to 3.5.3 of Eclipse Vert.x, the StaticHandler uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize '\' (forward slashes) sequences that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory when running on Windows Operating Systems. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12541 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Vert.x | 2023-11-07 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In version from 3.0.0 to 3.5.3 of Eclipse Vert.x, the WebSocket HTTP upgrade implementation buffers the full http request before doing the handshake, holding the entire request body in memory. There should be a reasonnable limit (8192 bytes) above which the WebSocket gets an HTTP response with the 413 status code and the connection gets closed. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12540 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Vert.x | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In version from 3.0.0 to 3.5.2 of Eclipse Vert.x, the CSRFHandler do not assert that the XSRF Cookie matches the returned XSRF header/form parameter. This allows replay attacks with previously issued tokens which are not expired yet. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12538 | 2 Eclipse, Netapp | 12 Jetty, E-series Santricity Management Plug-ins, E-series Santricity Os Controller and 9 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 through 9.4.8, when using the optional Jetty provided FileSessionDataStore for persistent storage of HttpSession details, it is possible for a malicious user to access/hijack other HttpSessions and even delete unmatched HttpSessions present in the FileSystem's storage for the FileSessionDataStore. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12536 | 2 Eclipse, Oracle | 2 Jetty, Retail Xstore Point Of Service | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In Eclipse Jetty Server, all 9.x versions, on webapps deployed using default Error Handling, when an intentionally bad query arrives that doesn't match a dynamic url-pattern, and is eventually handled by the DefaultServlet's static file serving, the bad characters can trigger a java.nio.file.InvalidPathException which includes the full path to the base resource directory that the DefaultServlet and/or webapp is using. If this InvalidPathException is then handled by the default Error Handler, the InvalidPathException message is included in the error response, revealing the full server path to the requesting system. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9735 | 3 Debian, Eclipse, Oracle | 7 Debian Linux, Jetty, Communications Cloud Native Core Policy and 4 more | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Jetty through 9.4.x is prone to a timing channel in util/security/Password.java, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access by observing elapsed times before rejection of incorrect passwords. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7658 | 5 Debian, Eclipse, Hp and 2 more | 20 Debian Linux, Jetty, Xp P9000 and 17 more | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7657 | 5 Debian, Eclipse, Hp and 2 more | 18 Debian Linux, Jetty, Xp P9000 and 15 more | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7656 | 2 Debian, Eclipse | 2 Debian Linux, Jetty | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), HTTP/0.9 is handled poorly. An HTTP/1 style request line (i.e. method space URI space version) that declares a version of HTTP/0.9 was accepted and treated as a 0.9 request. If deployed behind an intermediary that also accepted and passed through the 0.9 version (but did not act on it), then the response sent could be interpreted by the intermediary as HTTP/1 headers. This could be used to poison the cache if the server allowed the origin client to generate arbitrary content in the response. | |||||
| CVE-2023-5632 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Mosquitto | 2023-10-25 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Eclipse Mosquito before and including 2.0.5, establishing a connection to the mosquitto server without sending data causes the EPOLLOUT event to be added, which results excessive CPU consumption. This could be used by a malicious actor to perform denial of service type attack. This issue is fixed in 2.0.6 | |||||
| CVE-2023-36479 | 2 Debian, Eclipse | 2 Debian Linux, Jetty | 2023-10-16 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Eclipse Jetty Canonical Repository is the canonical repository for the Jetty project. Users of the CgiServlet with a very specific command structure may have the wrong command executed. If a user sends a request to a org.eclipse.jetty.servlets.CGI Servlet for a binary with a space in its name, the servlet will escape the command by wrapping it in quotation marks. This wrapped command, plus an optional command prefix, will then be executed through a call to Runtime.exec. If the original binary name provided by the user contains a quotation mark followed by a space, the resulting command line will contain multiple tokens instead of one. This issue was patched in version 9.4.52, 10.0.16, 11.0.16 and 12.0.0-beta2. | |||||
| CVE-2023-40167 | 2 Debian, Eclipse | 2 Debian Linux, Jetty | 2023-10-13 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Jetty is a Java based web server and servlet engine. Prior to versions 9.4.52, 10.0.16, 11.0.16, and 12.0.1, Jetty accepts the `+` character proceeding the content-length value in a HTTP/1 header field. This is more permissive than allowed by the RFC and other servers routinely reject such requests with 400 responses. There is no known exploit scenario, but it is conceivable that request smuggling could result if jetty is used in combination with a server that does not close the connection after sending such a 400 response. Versions 9.4.52, 10.0.16, 11.0.16, and 12.0.1 contain a patch for this issue. There is no workaround as there is no known exploit scenario. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41039 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Mosquitto | 2023-10-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In versions 1.6 to 2.0.11 of Eclipse Mosquitto, an MQTT v5 client connecting with a large number of user-property properties could cause excessive CPU usage, leading to a loss of performance and possible denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26048 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Jetty | 2023-09-30 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Jetty is a java based web server and servlet engine. In affected versions servlets with multipart support (e.g. annotated with `@MultipartConfig`) that call `HttpServletRequest.getParameter()` or `HttpServletRequest.getParts()` may cause `OutOfMemoryError` when the client sends a multipart request with a part that has a name but no filename and very large content. This happens even with the default settings of `fileSizeThreshold=0` which should stream the whole part content to disk. An attacker client may send a large multipart request and cause the server to throw `OutOfMemoryError`. However, the server may be able to recover after the `OutOfMemoryError` and continue its service -- although it may take some time. This issue has been patched in versions 9.4.51, 10.0.14, and 11.0.14. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may set the multipart parameter `maxRequestSize` which must be set to a non-negative value, so the whole multipart content is limited (although still read into memory). | |||||
| CVE-2023-4760 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Remote Application Platform | 2023-09-26 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Eclipse RAP versions from 3.0.0 up to and including 3.25.0, Remote Code Execution is possible on Windows when using the FileUpload component. The reason for this is a not completely secure extraction of the file name in the FileUploadProcessor.stripFileName(String name) method. As soon as this finds a / in the path, everything before it is removed, but potentially \ (backslashes) coming further back are kept. For example, a file name such as /..\..\webapps\shell.war can be used to upload a file to a Tomcat server under Windows, which is then saved as ..\..\webapps\shell.war in its webapps directory and can then be executed. | |||||
| CVE-2023-41034 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Leshan | 2023-09-06 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Eclipse Leshan is a device management server and client Java implementation. In affected versions DDFFileParser` and `DefaultDDFFileValidator` (and so `ObjectLoader`) are vulnerable to `XXE Attacks`. A DDF file is a LWM2M format used to store LWM2M object description. Leshan users are impacted only if they parse untrusted DDF files (e.g. if they let external users provide their own model), in that case they MUST upgrade to fixed version. If you parse only trusted DDF file and validate only with trusted xml schema, upgrading is not mandatory. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.5.0 and 2.0.0-M13. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2048 | 4 Debian, Eclipse, Jenkins and 1 more | 8 Debian Linux, Jetty, Jenkins and 5 more | 2023-07-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Eclipse Jetty HTTP/2 server implementation, when encountering an invalid HTTP/2 request, the error handling has a bug that can wind up not properly cleaning up the active connections and associated resources. This can lead to a Denial of Service scenario where there are no enough resources left to process good requests. | |||||
| CVE-2023-32081 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Vert.x Stomp | 2023-05-24 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Vert.x STOMP is a vert.x implementation of the STOMP specification that provides a STOMP server and client. From versions 3.1.0 until 3.9.16 and 4.0.0 until 4.4.2, a Vert.x STOMP server processes client STOMP frames without checking that the client send an initial CONNECT frame replied with a successful CONNECTED frame. The client can subscribe to a destination or publish message without prior authentication. Any Vert.x STOMP server configured with an authentication handler is impacted. The issue is patched in Vert.x 3.9.16 and 4.4.2. There are no trivial workarounds. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11774 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Omr | 2023-03-24 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Prior to 0.1, all builds of Eclipse OMR contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the loop by versioning - for example if there is a condition that is moved out of the loop that reads a field we may not privatize the value of that field in the modified copy of the loop allowing the test to see one value of the field and subsequently the loop to see a modified field value without retesting the condition moved out of the loop. This can lead to a variety of different issues but read out of array bounds is one major consequence of these problems. | |||||