Total
372 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-3924 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2022-04-19 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An exploitable use-after-free vulnerability exists in the JavaScript engine of Foxit Software's Foxit PDF Reader version 9.1.5096. A specially crafted PDF document can trigger a previously freed object in memory to be reused, resulting in arbitrary code execution. An attacker needs to trick the user into opening the malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. If the browser plugin extension is enabled, visiting a malicious site can also trigger the vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35931 | 3 Apple, Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Foxit Reader, Phantompdf and 1 more | 2021-09-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader before 10.1.1 (and before 4.1.1 on macOS) and PhantomPDF before 9.7.5 and 10.x before 10.1.1 (and before 4.1.1 on macOS). An attacker can spoof a certified PDF document via an Evil Annotation Attack because the products fail to consider a null value for a Subtype entry of the Annotation dictionary, in an incremental update. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26540 | 2 Apple, Foxitsoftware | 3 Macos, Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2021-09-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 4.1 on macOS. Because the Hardened Runtime protection mechanism is not applied to code signing, code injection (or an information leak) can occur. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8342 | 2 Apple, Foxitsoftware | 2 Macos, Foxit Reader | 2021-09-08 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A Local Privilege Escalation in libqcocoa.dylib in Foxit Reader 3.1.0.0111 on macOS has been discovered due to an incorrect permission set. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38574 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2021-08-12 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows SQL Injection via crafted data at the end of a string. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38573 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2021-08-12 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows writing to arbitrary files because a CombineFiles pathname is not validated. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33794 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2021-08-12 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Foxit Reader before 10.1.4 and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4 allow information disclosure or an application crash after mishandling the Tab key during XFA form interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38569 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2021-08-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows stack consumption via recursive function calls during the handling of XFA forms or link objects. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38570 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2021-08-12 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows attackers to delete arbitrary files (during uninstallation) via a symlink. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33793 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2021-08-12 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Foxit Reader before 10.1.4 and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4 have an out-of-bounds write because the Cross-Reference table is mishandled during Office document conversion. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38572 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2021-08-12 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows writing to arbitrary files because the extractPages pathname is not validated. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38571 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2021-08-12 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows DLL hijacking, aka CNVD-C-2021-68000 and CNVD-C-2021-68502. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26538 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2021-07-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1. It allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse taskkill.exe in the current working directory. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33795 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2021-07-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Foxit Reader before 10.1.4 and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4 produce incorrect PDF document signatures because the certificate name, document owner, and signature author are mishandled. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33792 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2021-07-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 10.1.4 and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4 have an out-of-bounds write via a crafted /Size key in the Trailer dictionary. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31476 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2021-06-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.3.37598. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA templates. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13531. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31443 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2021-05-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13240. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31442 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2021-05-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13239. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31441 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2021-05-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13101. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31446 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2021-05-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13245. | |||||