Filtered by vendor F5
Subscribe
Total
823 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2019-6664 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
On BIG-IP 15.0.0 and 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, under certain conditions, network protections on the management port do not follow current best practices. | |||||
CVE-2019-6597 | 1 F5 | 14 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 11 more | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
In BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.1.1, 12.1.0-12.1.3.7, 11.6.1-11.6.3.2, or 11.5.1-11.5.8 or Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, when authenticated administrative users run commands in the Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also referred to as the BIG-IP Configuration utility, restrictions on allowed commands may not be enforced. | |||||
CVE-2019-6665 | 1 F5 | 4 Big-ip Application Security Manager, Big-iq Centralized Management, Enterprise Manager and 1 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.4 CRITICAL |
On BIG-IP ASM 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, and 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, BIG-IQ 6.0.0 and 5.2.0-5.4.0, iWorkflow 2.3.0, and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, an attacker with access to the device communication between the BIG-IP ASM Central Policy Builder and the BIG-IQ/Enterprise Manager/F5 iWorkflow will be able to set up the proxy the same way and intercept the traffic. | |||||
CVE-2019-6604 | 1 F5 | 14 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 11 more | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
On BIG-IP 11.5.1-11.5.8, 11.6.1-11.6.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3.6, 13.0.0-13.1.1.1, and 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, under certain conditions, hardware systems with a High-Speed Bridge and using non-default Layer 2 forwarding configurations may experience a lockup of the High-Speed Bridge. | |||||
CVE-2019-6673 | 1 F5 | 8 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Application Acceleration Manager and 5 more | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
On versions 15.0.0-15.0.1 and 14.0.0-14.1.2, when the BIG-IP is configured in HTTP/2 Full Proxy mode, specifically crafted requests may cause a disruption of service provided by the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM). | |||||
CVE-2019-6634 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2020-08-24 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, and 12.1.0-12.1.4, a high volume of malformed analytics report requests leads to instability in restjavad process. This causes issues with both iControl REST and some portions of TMUI. The attack requires an authenticated user with any role. | |||||
CVE-2018-15331 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Application Acceleration Manager | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
On BIG-IP AAM 13.0.0 or 12.1.0-12.1.3.7, the dcdb_convert utility used by BIG-IP AAM fails to drop group permissions when executing helper scripts, which could be used to leverage attacks against the BIG-IP system. | |||||
CVE-2019-6608 | 1 F5 | 14 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 11 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.1 HIGH | 5.9 MEDIUM |
On BIG-IP 11.5.1-11.6.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3, 13.0.0-13.1.1.1, and 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, under certain conditions, the snmpd daemon may leak memory on a multi-blade BIG-IP vCMP guest when processing authorized SNMP requests. | |||||
CVE-2019-6647 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.2-11.6.4, when processing authentication attempts for control-plane users MCPD leaks a small amount of memory. Under rare conditions attackers with access to the management interface could eventually deplete memory on the system. | |||||
CVE-2019-6628 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Policy Enforcement Manager | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
On BIG-IP PEM 14.1.0-14.1.0.5 and 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, under certain conditions, the TMM process may terminate and restart while processing BIG-IP PEM traffic with the OpenVPN classifier. | |||||
CVE-2019-6677 | 1 F5 | 11 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 8 more | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
On BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, and 12.1.0-12.1.5, under certain conditions when using custom TCP congestion control settings in a TCP profile, TMM stops processing traffic when processed by an iRule. | |||||
CVE-2019-6636 | 1 F5 | 2 Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Application Security Manager | 2020-08-24 | 8.5 HIGH | 8.4 HIGH |
On BIG-IP (AFM, ASM) 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, 12.1.0-12.1.4, and 11.5.1-11.6.4, a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in AFM feed list. In the worst case, an attacker can store a CSRF which results in code execution as the admin user. The level of user role which can perform this attack are resource administrator and administrator. | |||||
CVE-2019-6609 | 1 F5 | 37 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 34 more | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
Platform dependent weakness. This issue only impacts iSeries platforms. On these platforms, in BIG-IP (LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, FPS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, WebAccelerator) versions 14.0.0-14.1.0.1, 13.0.0-13.1.1.3, and 12.1.1 HF2-12.1.4, the secureKeyCapable attribute was not set which causes secure vault to not use the F5 hardware support to store the unit key. Instead the unit key is stored in plaintext on disk as would be the case for Z100 systems. Additionally this causes the unit key to be stored in UCS files taken on these platforms. | |||||
CVE-2019-6624 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, and 12.1.0-12.1.4, an undisclosed traffic pattern sent to a BIG-IP UDP virtual server may lead to a denial-of-service (DoS). | |||||
CVE-2018-5520 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2020-08-24 | 3.5 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
On an F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.5, 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, or 11.2.1-11.6.3.1 system configured in Appliance mode, the TMOS Shell (tmsh) may allow an administrative user to use the dig utility to gain unauthorized access to file system resources. | |||||
CVE-2019-6680 | 1 F5 | 11 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 8 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
On BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, 13.1.0-13.1.3.2, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.2-11.6.5, while processing traffic through a standard virtual server that targets a FastL4 virtual server (VIP on VIP), hardware appliances may stop responding. | |||||
CVE-2019-6596 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Access Policy Manager | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
In BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, 13.0.0-13.1.1.1, 12.1.0-12.1.3.6, 11.6.1-11.6.3.2, or 11.5.1-11.5.8, when processing fragmented ClientHello messages in a DTLS session TMM may corrupt memory eventually leading to a crash. Only systems offering DTLS connections via APM are impacted. | |||||
CVE-2019-6630 | 1 F5 | 1 Ssl Orchestrator | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
On F5 SSL Orchestrator 14.1.0-14.1.0.5 and 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, undisclosed traffic flow may cause TMM to restart under certain circumstances. | |||||
CVE-2019-6637 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Application Security Manager | 2020-08-24 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
On BIG-IP (ASM) 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, and 12.1.0-12.1.4, Application logic abuse of ASM REST endpoints can lead to instability of BIG-IP system. Exploitation of this issue causes excessive memory consumption which results in the Linux kernel triggering OOM killer on arbitrary processes. The attack requires an authenticated user with role of "Guest" or greater privilege. Note: "No Access" cannot login so technically it's a role but a user with this access role cannot perform the attack. | |||||
CVE-2020-5901 | 1 F5 | 1 Nginx Controller | 2020-07-10 | 9.3 HIGH | 9.6 CRITICAL |
In NGINX Controller 3.3.0-3.4.0, undisclosed API endpoints may allow for a reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attack. If the victim user is logged in as admin this could result in a complete compromise of the system. |