Filtered by vendor Gitlab
Subscribe
Total
1001 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-39941 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-12-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE versions 12.0 to 14.3.6, 14.4 to 14.4.4, and 14.5 to 14.5.2 allowed non-project members to see the default branch name for projects that restrict access to the repository to project members | |||||
| CVE-2021-39944 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-12-15 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 11.0 before 14.3.6, all versions starting from 14.4 before 14.4.4, all versions starting from 14.5 before 14.5.2. A permissions validation flaw allowed group members with a developer role to elevate their privilege to a maintainer on projects they import | |||||
| CVE-2021-39945 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-12-15 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 2.7 LOW |
| Improper access control in the GitLab CE/EE API affecting all versions starting from 9.4 before 14.3.6, all versions starting from 14.4 before 14.4.4, all versions starting from 14.5 before 14.5.2, allows an author of a Merge Request to approve the Merge Request even after having their project access revoked | |||||
| CVE-2021-39935 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-12-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 10.5 before 14.3.6, all versions starting from 14.4 before 14.4.4, all versions starting from 14.5 before 14.5.2. Unauthorized external users could perform Server Side Requests via the CI Lint API | |||||
| CVE-2021-39939 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-12-15 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in GitLab Runner affecting all versions starting from 13.7 before 14.3.6, all versions starting from 14.4 before 14.4.4, all versions starting from 14.5 before 14.5.2, allows an attacker triggering a job with a specially crafted docker image to exhaust resources on runner manager | |||||
| CVE-2021-22220 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-12-10 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions starting with 13.10. GitLab was vulnerable to a stored XSS in blob viewer of notebooks. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39890 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-12-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| It was possible to bypass 2FA for LDAP users and access some specific pages with Basic Authentication in GitLab 14.1.1 and above. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39912 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A potential DoS vulnerability was discovered in GitLab CE/EE starting with version 13.7. Using a malformed TIFF images was possible to trigger memory exhaustion. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39902 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-08 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Incorrect Authorization in GitLab CE/EE 13.4 or above allows a user with guest membership in a project to modify the severity of an incident. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39907 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A potential DOS vulnerability was discovered in GitLab CE/EE starting with version 13.7. The stripping of EXIF data from certain images resulted in high CPU usage. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39906 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-08 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Improper validation of ipynb files in GitLab CE/EE version 13.5 and above allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code on the victim's behalf. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39895 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-08 | 2.1 LOW | 4.5 MEDIUM |
| In all versions of GitLab CE/EE since version 8.0, an attacker can set the pipeline schedules to be active in a project export so when an unsuspecting owner imports that project, pipelines are active by default on that project. Under specialized conditions, this may lead to information disclosure if the project is imported from an untrusted source. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39901 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-08 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 2.7 LOW |
| In all versions of GitLab CE/EE since version 11.10, an admin of a group can see the SCIM token of that group by visiting a specific endpoint. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39897 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Improper access control in GitLab CE/EE version 10.5 and above allowed subgroup members with inherited access to a project from a parent group to still have access even after the subgroup is transferred | |||||
| CVE-2021-39905 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-08 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in the GitLab CE/EE API since version 8.9.6 allows a user to see basic information on private groups that a public project has been shared with | |||||
| CVE-2019-5461 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-03 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 3.5 LOW |
| An input validation problem was discovered in the GitHub service integration which could result in an attacker being able to make arbitrary POST requests in a GitLab instance's internal network. This vulnerability was addressed in 12.1.2, 12.0.4, and 11.11.6. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15590 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An access control issue exists in < 12.3.5, < 12.2.8, and < 12.1.14 for GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) where private merge requests and issues would be disclosed with the Group Search feature provided by Elasticsearch integration | |||||
| CVE-2019-15576 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in GitLab CE/EE <v12.3.2, <v12.2.6, and <v12.1.12 that allowed an attacker to view private system notes from a GraphQL endpoint. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15577 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-02 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in GitLab CE/EE <v12.3.2, <v12.2.6, and <v12.1.12 that allowed project milestones to be disclosed via groups browsing. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15579 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-11-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure exists in < 12.3.2, < 12.2.6, and < 12.1.12 for GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) where the assignee(s) of a confidential issue in a private project would be disclosed to a guest via milestones. | |||||