Filtered by vendor Openssl
Subscribe
Total
255 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3732 | 2 Nodejs, Openssl | 2 Node.js, Openssl | 2022-08-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2k and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3738 | 3 Debian, Nodejs, Openssl | 3 Debian Linux, Node.js, Openssl | 2022-08-19 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This only affects processors that support the AVX2 but not ADX extensions like Intel Haswell (4th generation). Note: The impact from this issue is similar to CVE-2017-3736, CVE-2017-3732 and CVE-2015-3193. OpenSSL version 1.0.2-1.0.2m and 1.1.0-1.1.0g are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing a new release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 at this time. The fix will be included in OpenSSL 1.1.0h when it becomes available. The fix is also available in commit e502cc86d in the OpenSSL git repository. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3731 | 2 Nodejs, Openssl | 2 Node.js, Openssl | 2022-08-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| If an SSL/TLS server or client is running on a 32-bit host, and a specific cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that server or client to perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash. For OpenSSL 1.1.0, the crash can be triggered when using CHACHA20/POLY1305; users should upgrade to 1.1.0d. For Openssl 1.0.2, the crash can be triggered when using RC4-MD5; users who have not disabled that algorithm should update to 1.0.2k. | |||||
| CVE-2010-4180 | 7 Canonical, Debian, F5 and 4 more | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Nginx and 6 more | 2022-08-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.8q, and 1.0.x before 1.0.0c, when SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG is enabled, does not properly prevent modification of the ciphersuite in the session cache, which allows remote attackers to force the downgrade to an unintended cipher via vectors involving sniffing network traffic to discover a session identifier. | |||||
| CVE-2008-1672 | 2 Canonical, Openssl | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Openssl | 2022-02-02 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.8f and 0.9.8g allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a TLS handshake that omits the Server Key Exchange message and uses "particular cipher suites," which triggers a NULL pointer dereference. | |||||
| CVE-2004-0081 | 23 4d, Apple, Avaya and 20 more | 66 Webstar, Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server and 63 more | 2021-11-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.6 before 0.9.6d does not properly handle unknown message types, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop), as demonstrated using the Codenomicon TLS Test Tool. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0590 | 2 Debian, Openssl | 2 Debian Linux, Openssl | 2020-11-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The ASN1_STRING_print_ex function in OpenSSL before 0.9.8k allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid memory access and application crash) via vectors that trigger printing of a (1) BMPString or (2) UniversalString with an invalid encoded length. | |||||
| CVE-2009-3767 | 4 Apple, Fedoraproject, Openldap and 1 more | 4 Mac Os X, Fedora, Openldap and 1 more | 2020-10-14 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| libraries/libldap/tls_o.c in OpenLDAP 2.2 and 2.4, and possibly other versions, when OpenSSL is used, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0428 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2020-10-13 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| OpenSSL and SSLeay allow remote attackers to reuse SSL sessions and bypass access controls. | |||||
| CVE-2009-3766 | 2 Mutt, Openssl | 2 Mutt, Openssl | 2019-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| mutt_ssl.c in mutt 1.5.16 and other versions before 1.5.19, when OpenSSL is used, does not verify the domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3737 | 2 Debian, Openssl | 2 Debian Linux, Openssl | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| OpenSSL 1.0.2 (starting from version 1.0.2b) introduced an "error state" mechanism. The intent was that if a fatal error occurred during a handshake then OpenSSL would move into the error state and would immediately fail if you attempted to continue the handshake. This works as designed for the explicit handshake functions (SSL_do_handshake(), SSL_accept() and SSL_connect()), however due to a bug it does not work correctly if SSL_read() or SSL_write() is called directly. In that scenario, if the handshake fails then a fatal error will be returned in the initial function call. If SSL_read()/SSL_write() is subsequently called by the application for the same SSL object then it will succeed and the data is passed without being decrypted/encrypted directly from the SSL/TLS record layer. In order to exploit this issue an application bug would have to be present that resulted in a call to SSL_read()/SSL_write() being issued after having already received a fatal error. OpenSSL version 1.0.2b-1.0.2m are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. OpenSSL 1.1.0 is not affected. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3730 | 2 Openssl, Oracle | 7 Openssl, Agile Engineering Data Management, Communications Application Session Controller and 4 more | 2019-04-25 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d, if a malicious server supplies bad parameters for a DHE or ECDHE key exchange then this can result in the client attempting to dereference a NULL pointer leading to a client crash. This could be exploited in a Denial of Service attack. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3736 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2019-04-23 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0g. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. This only affects processors that support the BMI1, BMI2 and ADX extensions like Intel Broadwell (5th generation) and later or AMD Ryzen. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3733 | 2 Hp, Openssl | 2 Operations Agent, Openssl | 2019-04-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| During a renegotiation handshake if the Encrypt-Then-Mac extension is negotiated where it was not in the original handshake (or vice-versa) then this can cause OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0e to crash (dependent on ciphersuite). Both clients and servers are affected. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0851 | 2 Cisco, Openssl | 5 Css11000 Content Services Switch, Ios, Pix Firewall and 2 more | 2018-10-30 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.6k allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash via large recursion) via malformed ASN.1 sequences. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0147 | 3 Openpkg, Openssl, Stunnel | 3 Openpkg, Openssl, Stunnel | 2018-10-19 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| OpenSSL does not use RSA blinding by default, which allows local and remote attackers to obtain the server's private key by determining factors using timing differences on (1) the number of extra reductions during Montgomery reduction, and (2) the use of different integer multiplication algorithms ("Karatsuba" and normal). | |||||
| CVE-2003-0131 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2018-10-19 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The SSL and TLS components for OpenSSL 0.9.6i and earlier, 0.9.7, and 0.9.7a allow remote attackers to perform an unauthorized RSA private key operation via a modified Bleichenbacher attack that uses a large number of SSL or TLS connections using PKCS #1 v1.5 padding that cause OpenSSL to leak information regarding the relationship between ciphertext and the associated plaintext, aka the "Klima-Pokorny-Rosa attack." | |||||
| CVE-2006-2940 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2018-10-18 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.7 before 0.9.7l, 0.9.8 before 0.9.8d, and earlier versions allows attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via parasitic public keys with large (1) "public exponent" or (2) "public modulus" values in X.509 certificates that require extra time to process when using RSA signature verification. | |||||
| CVE-2006-2937 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2018-10-18 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.7 before 0.9.7l and 0.9.8 before 0.9.8d allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and memory consumption) via malformed ASN.1 structures that trigger an improperly handled error condition. | |||||
| CVE-2006-4343 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Openssl | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Openssl | 2018-10-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The get_server_hello function in the SSLv2 client code in OpenSSL 0.9.7 before 0.9.7l, 0.9.8 before 0.9.8d, and earlier versions allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (client crash) via unknown vectors that trigger a null pointer dereference. | |||||