Total
3411 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-1057 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-07-03 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Microsoft XML Core Services MSXML parser processes user input. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run malicious code remotely to take control of the user’s system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could host a specially crafted website designed to invoke MSXML through a web browser. However, an attacker would have no way to force a user to visit such a website. Instead, an attacker would typically have to convince a user to either click a link in an email message or instant message that would then take the user to the website. When Internet Explorer parses the XML content, an attacker could run malicious code remotely to take control of the user’s system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the MSXML parser processes user input. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10072 | 1 Wampserver | 1 Wampserver | 2024-07-03 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| WampServer 3.0.6 has two files called 'wampmanager.exe' and 'unins000.exe' with a weak ACL for Modify. This could potentially allow an authorized but non-privileged local user to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges on the system. To properly exploit this vulnerability, the local attacker must insert an executable file called wampmanager.exe or unins000.exe and replace the original files. The next time one of these programs is launched by a more privileged user, malicious code chosen by the local attacker will run. NOTE: the vendor disputes the relevance of this report, taking the position that a configuration in which "'someone' (an attacker) is able to replace files on a PC" is not "the fault of WampServer. | |||||
| CVE-2010-5164 | 2 Kingsoft, Microsoft | 2 Personal Firewall 9, Windows Xp | 2024-07-03 | 6.2 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Race condition in KingSoft Personal Firewall 9 Plus 2009.05.07.70 on Windows XP allows local users to bypass kernel-mode hook handlers, and execute dangerous code that would otherwise be blocked by a handler but not blocked by signature-based malware detection, via certain user-space memory changes during hook-handler execution, aka an argument-switch attack or a KHOBE attack. NOTE: this issue is disputed by some third parties because it is a flaw in a protection mechanism for situations where a crafted program has already begun to execute | |||||
| CVE-2010-5153 | 2 Avira, Microsoft | 2 Premium Security Suite, Windows Xp | 2024-07-03 | 6.2 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Race condition in Avira Premium Security Suite 10.0.0.536 on Windows XP allows local users to bypass kernel-mode hook handlers, and execute dangerous code that would otherwise be blocked by a handler but not blocked by signature-based malware detection, via certain user-space memory changes during hook-handler execution, aka an argument-switch attack or a KHOBE attack. NOTE: this issue is disputed by some third parties because it is a flaw in a protection mechanism for situations where a crafted program has already begun to execute | |||||
| CVE-2024-3995 | 2024-07-01 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In Helix ALM versions prior to 2024.2.0, a local command injection was identified. Reported by Bryan Riggins. | |||||
| CVE-2014-4148 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1 and 6 more | 2024-06-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| win32k.sys in the kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted TrueType font, as exploited in the wild in October 2014, aka "TrueType Font Parsing Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0557 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Office, Office Excel Viewer, Office Sharepoint Server | 2024-06-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Excel in Microsoft Office 2000 SP3, Office XP SP3, Office 2003 SP3, and Office 2004 and 2008 for Mac; Excel in 2007 Microsoft Office System SP1 and SP2; Open XML File Format Converter for Mac; Microsoft Office Excel Viewer 2003 SP3; Microsoft Office Excel Viewer; and Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint 2007 File Formats SP1 and SP2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Excel file with a malformed record object, aka "Object Record Corruption Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2022-22963 | 2 Oracle, Vmware | 28 Banking Branch, Banking Cash Management, Banking Corporate Lending Process Management and 25 more | 2024-06-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39144 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 15 Debian Linux, Fedora, Snapmanager and 12 more | 2024-06-28 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.5 HIGH |
| XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker has sufficient rights to execute commands of the host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37109 | 2024-06-28 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL | ||
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Membership Software WishList Member X allows Code Injection.This issue affects WishList Member X: from n/a before 3.26.7. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5826 | 2024-06-27 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| In the latest version of vanna-ai/vanna, the `vanna.ask` function is vulnerable to remote code execution due to prompt injection. The root cause is the lack of a sandbox when executing LLM-generated code, allowing an attacker to manipulate the code executed by the `exec` function in `src/vanna/base/base.py`. This vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker to achieve remote code execution on the app backend server, potentially gaining full control of the server. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5751 | 2024-06-27 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| BerriAI/litellm version v1.35.8 contains a vulnerability where an attacker can achieve remote code execution. The vulnerability exists in the `add_deployment` function, which decodes and decrypts environment variables from base64 and assigns them to `os.environ`. An attacker can exploit this by sending a malicious payload to the `/config/update` endpoint, which is then processed and executed by the server when the `get_secret` function is triggered. This requires the server to use Google KMS and a database to store a model. | |||||
| CVE-2023-3519 | 1 Citrix | 2 Netscaler Application Delivery Controller, Netscaler Gateway | 2024-06-27 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Unauthenticated remote code execution | |||||
| CVE-2023-33246 | 1 Apache | 1 Rocketmq | 2024-06-27 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| For RocketMQ versions 5.1.0 and below, under certain conditions, there is a risk of remote command execution. Several components of RocketMQ, including NameServer, Broker, and Controller, are leaked on the extranet and lack permission verification, an attacker can exploit this vulnerability by using the update configuration function to execute commands as the system users that RocketMQ is running as. Additionally, an attacker can achieve the same effect by forging the RocketMQ protocol content. To prevent these attacks, users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.1.1 or above for using RocketMQ 5.x or 4.9.6 or above for using RocketMQ 4.x . | |||||
| CVE-2020-35734 | 1 Batflat | 1 Batflat | 2024-06-26 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| Sruu.pl in Batflat 1.3.6 allows an authenticated user to perform code injection (and consequently Remote Code Execution) via the input fields of the Users tab. To exploit this, one must login to the administration panel and edit an arbitrary user's data (username, displayed name, etc.). NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer | |||||
| CVE-2024-4883 | 2024-06-26 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2023.1.3, a Remote Code Execution issue exists in Progress WhatsUp Gold. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to achieve the RCE as a service account through NmApi.exe. | |||||
| CVE-2024-4884 | 2024-06-26 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2023.1.3, an unauthenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability in Progress WhatsUpGold. The Apm.UI.Areas.APM.Controllers.CommunityController allows execution of commands with iisapppool\nmconsole privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37228 | 2024-06-24 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL | ||
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in InstaWP Team InstaWP Connect allows Code Injection.This issue affects InstaWP Connect: from n/a through 0.1.0.38. | |||||
| CVE-2024-3121 | 2024-06-24 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM | ||
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the create_conda_env function of the parisneo/lollms repository, version 5.9.0. The vulnerability arises from the use of shell=True in the subprocess.Popen function, which allows an attacker to inject arbitrary commands by manipulating the env_name and python_version parameters. This issue could lead to a serious security breach as demonstrated by the ability to execute the 'whoami' command among potentially other harmful commands. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5683 | 2024-06-24 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Next4Biz CRM & BPM Software Business Process Manangement (BPM) allows Remote Code Inclusion.This issue affects Business Process Manangement (BPM): from 6.6.4.4 before 6.6.4.5. | |||||