Total
1167 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-15021 | 1 Zingbox | 1 Inspector | 2022-01-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A security vulnerability exists in the Zingbox Inspector versions 1.294 and earlier, that can allow an attacker to easily identify instances of Zingbox Inspectors in a local area network. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20474 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Remote Access Plus | 2022-01-01 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Zoho ManageEngine Remote Access Plus 10.0.447. The service to test the mail-server configuration suffers from an authorization issue allowing a user with the Guest role (read-only access) to use and abuse it. One of the abuses allows performing network and port scan operations of the localhost or the hosts on the same network segment, aka SSRF. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18846 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite | 2022-01-01 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| OX App Suite through 7.10.2 allows SSRF. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8118 | 3 Nextcloud, Novell, Opensuse | 3 Nextcloud Server, Suse Linux Enterprise Server, Backports Sle | 2021-12-22 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| An authenticated server-side request forgery in Nextcloud server 16.0.1 allowed to detect local and remote services when adding a new subscription in the calendar application. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22054 | 1 Vmware | 1 Workspace One Uem Console | 2021-12-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| VMware Workspace ONE UEM console 20.0.8 prior to 20.0.8.37, 20.11.0 prior to 20.11.0.40, 21.2.0 prior to 21.2.0.27, and 21.5.0 prior to 21.5.0.37 contain an SSRF vulnerability. This issue may allow a malicious actor with network access to UEM to send their requests without authentication and to gain access to sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3959 | 1 Bitdefender | 1 Gravityzone | 2021-12-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the EPPUpdateService component of Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools allows an attacker to proxy requests to the relay server. This issue affects: Bitdefender Bitdefender GravityZone versions prior to 3.3.8.272 | |||||
| CVE-2021-39303 | 1 Jamf | 1 Jamf | 2021-12-16 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The server in Jamf Pro before 10.32.0 has an SSRF vulnerability, aka PI-006352. NOTE: Jamf Nation will also publish an article about this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39057 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Spectrum Protect Plus, Linux Kernel | 2021-12-15 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.8.x is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 214616. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23718 | 1 Ssrf-agent Project | 1 Ssrf-agent | 2021-12-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The package ssrf-agent before 1.0.5 are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the defaultIpChecker function. It fails to properly validate if the IP requested is private. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39935 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-12-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 10.5 before 14.3.6, all versions starting from 14.4 before 14.4.4, all versions starting from 14.5 before 14.5.2. Unauthorized external users could perform Server Side Requests via the CI Lint API | |||||
| CVE-2019-3395 | 1 Atlassian | 2 Confluence, Confluence Server | 2021-12-13 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The WebDAV endpoint in Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center before version 6.6.7 (the fixed version for 6.6.x), from version 6.7.0 before 6.8.5 (the fixed version for 6.8.x), and from version 6.9.0 before 6.9.3 (the fixed version for 6.9.x) allows remote attackers to send arbitrary HTTP and WebDAV requests from a Confluence Server or Data Center instance via Server-Side Request Forgery. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37940 | 1 Elastic | 1 Enterprise Search | 2021-12-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure via GET request server-side request forgery vulnerability was discovered with the Workplace Search Github Enterprise Server integration. Using this vulnerability, a malicious Workplace Search admin could use the GHES integration to view hosts that might not be publicly accessible. | |||||
| CVE-2021-4075 | 1 Snipeitapp | 1 Snipe-it | 2021-12-07 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| snipe-it is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) | |||||
| CVE-2021-40091 | 1 Squaredup | 1 Squaredup | 2021-12-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An SSRF issue was discovered in SquaredUp for SCOM 5.2.1.6654. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29863 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Qradar Security Information And Event Manager, Linux Kernel | 2021-12-02 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM QRadar SIEM 7.3 and 7.4 is vulnerable to server side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-4786. IBM X-Force ID: 206087. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40809 | 1 Jamf | 1 Jamf | 2021-12-02 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Jamf Pro before 10.32.0, aka PI-009921. An account can be granted incorrect privileges in response to authentication that uses specific sign-on workflows. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3552 | 1 Bitdefender | 2 Endpoint Security Tools, Gravityzone | 2021-12-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the EPPUpdateService component of Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools allows an attacker to proxy requests to the relay server. This issue affects: Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools versions prior to 6.6.27.390; versions prior to 7.1.2.33. Bitdefender GravityZone 6.24.1-1. | |||||
| CVE-2021-36327 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Streaming Data Platform | 2021-12-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Dell EMC Streaming Data Platform versions before 1.3 contain a Server Side Request Forgery Vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to perform port scanning of internal networks and make HTTP requests to an arbitrary domain of the attacker's choice. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3553 | 1 Bitdefender | 2 Endpoint Security Tools, Gravityzone | 2021-11-30 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the EPPUpdateService of Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools allows an attacker to use the Endpoint Protection relay as a proxy for any remote host. This issue affects: Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools versions prior to 6.6.27.390; versions prior to 7.1.2.33. Bitdefender Unified Endpoint for Linux versions prior to 6.2.21.160. Bitdefender GravityZone versions prior to 6.24.1-1. | |||||
| CVE-2021-43780 | 1 Redash | 1 Redash | 2021-11-30 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Redash is a package for data visualization and sharing. In versions 10.0 and priorm the implementation of URL-loading data sources like JSON, CSV, or Excel is vulnerable to advanced methods of Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). These vulnerabilities are only exploitable on installations where a URL-loading data source is enabled. As of time of publication, the `master` and `release/10.x.x` branches address this by applying the Advocate library for making http requests instead of the requests library directly. Users should upgrade to version 10.0.1 to receive this patch. There are a few workarounds for mitigating the vulnerability without upgrading. One can disable the vulnerable data sources entirely, by adding the following env variable to one's configuration, making them unavailable inside the webapp. One can switch any data source of certain types (viewable in the GitHub Security Advisory) to be `View Only` for all groups on the Settings > Groups > Data Sources screen. For users unable to update an admin may modify Redash's configuration through environment variables to mitigate this issue. Depending on the version of Redash, an admin may also need to run a CLI command to re-encrypt some fields in the database. The `master` and `release/10.x.x` branches as of time of publication have removed the default value for `REDASH_COOKIE_SECRET`. All future releases will also require this to be set explicitly. For existing installations, one will need to ensure that explicit values are set for the `REDASH_COOKIE_SECRET` and `REDASH_SECRET_KEY `variables. | |||||