Total
5841 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-1473 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Vulnerability Manager | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Enterprise Manager in McAfee Vulnerability Manager (MVM) 7.5.5 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that modify HTML via unspecified vectors related to the "response web page." | |||||
| CVE-2014-1211 | 1 Vmware | 1 Vcloud Director | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VMware vCloud Director 5.1.x before 5.1.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that trigger a logout. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0969 | 1 Ibm | 2 Infosphere Master Data Management, Infosphere Master Data Management Server For Product Information Management | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the GDS component in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management - Collaborative Edition 10.x and 11.x before 11.0-FP5 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.x through 11.x before 11.3-IF2 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0961 | 1 Ibm | 2 Security Identity Manager, Tivoli Identity Manager | 2017-08-29 | 6.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Tivoli Identity Manager (ITIM) 5.0 before 5.0.0.15 and 5.1 before 5.1.0.15 and IBM Security Identity Manager (ISIM) 6.0 before 6.0.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0944 | 1 Ibm | 1 Operational Decision Manager | 2017-08-29 | 6.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the RES Console in Rule Execution Server in IBM Operational Decision Manager 7.5 before FP3 IF37, 8.0 before MP1 FP2, and 8.5 before MP1 IF26 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0933 | 1 Ibm | 1 Infosphere Information Server Metadata Workbench | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Information Server Metadata Workbench 8.1 through 9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0929 | 1 Ibm | 1 Connections | 2017-08-29 | 6.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Profiles component in IBM Connections through 3.0.1.1 CR3 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that trigger follow actions. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0885 | 1 Ibm | 1 Lotus Protector For Mail Security | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Admin Web UI in IBM Lotus Protector for Mail Security 2.8.x before 2.8.1-22905 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0873 | 1 Ibm | 1 Infosphere Master Data Management Server | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) Data Stewardship, (2) Business Admin, and (3) Product interfaces in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management (MDM) Server 8.5 before 8.5.0.82, 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.38, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.35, 10.0 before 10.0.0.0.26, and 10.1 before 10.1.0.0.15 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0835 | 1 Ibm | 1 Qradar Security Information And Event Manager | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Security QRadar SIEM 7.2 MR1 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify console Auto Update settings. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0813 | 1 Phpmyfaq | 1 Phpmyfaq | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in phpMyFAQ before 2.8.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify settings. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0641 | 1 Emc | 1 Rsa Archer Egrc | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EMC RSA Archer GRC Platform 5.x before 5.5 SP1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. | |||||
| CVE-2013-7057 | 1 Axway | 1 Securetransport | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Axway SecureTransport 5.1 SP2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests that upload arbitrary files via a crafted request to api/v1.0/files/. | |||||
| CVE-2013-7043 | 1 Cisco | 4 Scientific Atlanta Dpr2325, Scientific Atlanta Dpr2325 Firmware, Scientific Atlanta Dpr\/epr2320 and 1 more | 2017-08-29 | 8.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on Cisco Scientific Atlanta DPR2320R2 routers with software 2.0.2r1262-090417 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change a password via the Password parameter to goform/RgSecurity; (2) reboot the device via the Restart parameter to goform/restart; (3) modify Wi-Fi settings, as demonstrated by the WpaPreSharedKey parameter to goform/wlanSecurity; or (4) modify parental controls via the ParentalPassword parameter to goform/RgParentalBasic. | |||||
| CVE-2013-5937 | 2 Click2sell, Drupal | 2 Click2sell Suite Module, Drupal | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Click2Sell Suite module 6.x-1.x for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete database information via vectors involving the Drupal Form API. | |||||
| CVE-2013-5672 | 2 Indianic, Wordpress | 2 Testimonial Plugin, Wordpress | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the IndiaNIC Testimonial plugin 2.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a testimonial via an iNIC_testimonial_save action; (2) add a listing template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_listing_template action; (3) add a widget template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_widget action; insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (4) project_name, (5) project_url, (6) client_name, (7) client_city, (8) client_state, (9) description, (10) tags, (11) video_url, or (12) is_featured, (13) title, (14) widget_title, (15) no_of_testimonials, (16) filter_by_country, (17) filter_by_tags, or (18) widget_template parameter to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php. | |||||
| CVE-2013-5443 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cognos Express | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Cognos Express 9.0 before IFIX 2, 9.5 before IFIX 2, 10.1 before IFIX 2, and 10.2.1 before FP1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. | |||||
| CVE-2013-5427 | 1 Ibm | 2 Infosphere Master Data Management Collaboration Server, Infosphere Master Data Management Server For Product Information Management | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management - Collaborative Edition 10.x before 10.1 FP8 through 11.0 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.0 and 9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. | |||||
| CVE-2013-5316 | 1 Ritecms | 1 Ritecms | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RiteCMS 1.0.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrator password via an edit user action to cms/index.php. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4911 | 1 Siemens | 1 Wincc | 2017-08-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Siemens WinCC (TIA Portal) 11 and 12 before 12 SP1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims by leveraging improper configuration of SIMATIC HMI panels by the WinCC product. | |||||