Total
5841 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-0480 | 1 Vitalpbx | 1 Vitalpbx | 2023-04-10 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| VitalPBX version 3.2.3-8 allows an unauthenticated external attacker to obtain the instance administrator's account. This is possible because the application is vulnerable to CSRF. | |||||
| CVE-2023-28848 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 User Oidc | 2023-04-10 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| user_oidc is the OIDC connect user backend for Nextcloud, an open source collaboration platform. A vulnerability in versions 1.0.0 until 1.3.0 effectively allowed an attacker to bypass the state protection as they could just copy the expected state token from the first request to their second request. Users should upgrade user_oidc to 1.3.0 to receive a patch for the issue. No known workarounds are available. | |||||
| CVE-2023-28676 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Convert To Pipeline | 2023-04-08 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Convert To Pipeline Plugin 1.0 and earlier allows attackers to create a Pipeline based on a Freestyle project, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE). | |||||
| CVE-2023-28674 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Octoperf Load Testing | 2023-04-08 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OctoPerf Load Testing Plugin Plugin 4.5.2 and earlier allows attackers to connect to a previously configured Octoperf server using attacker-specified credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2023-28671 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Octoperf Load Testing | 2023-04-07 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OctoPerf Load Testing Plugin Plugin 4.5.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2846 | 1 Dwbooster | 1 Calendar Event Multi View | 2023-04-05 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Calendar Event Multi View WordPress plugin before 1.4.07 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks in place when creating an event, and is also lacking sanitisation as well as escaping in some of the event fields. This could allow unauthenticated attackers to create arbitrary events and put Cross-Site Scripting payloads in it. | |||||
| CVE-2022-41413 | 1 Perfsonar | 1 Perfsonar | 2023-04-03 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| perfSONAR v4.x <= v4.4.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which is triggered when an attacker injects crafted input into the Search function. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1958 | 1 Cisco | 1 Hyperflex Hx Data Platform | 2023-03-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco HyperFlex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38329 | 1 Shopxian | 1 Shopxian Cms | 2023-03-29 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Shopxian CMS 3.0.0. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can delete the specified column via index.php/contents-admin_cat-finderdel-model-ContentsCat.html?id=17. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1858 | 1 Ibm | 1 Api Connect | 2023-03-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM API Connect 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.8.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 151256. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27234 | 1 Jizhicms | 1 Jizhicms | 2023-03-20 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in /Sys/index.html of Jizhicms v2.4.5 allows attackers to arbitrarily make configuration changes within the application. | |||||
| CVE-2023-1205 | 1 Netgear | 2 Rax30, Rax30 Firmware | 2023-03-15 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| NETGEAR Nighthawk WiFi6 Router prior to V1.0.10.94 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery attacks on all endpoints due to improperly implemented CSRF protections. | |||||
| CVE-2022-48309 | 1 Sophos | 1 Connect | 2023-03-09 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A CSRF vulnerability allows malicious websites to retrieve logs and technical support archives in Sophos Connect versions older than 2.2.90. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15150 | 1 Schine.games | 1 Mw-oauth2client | 2023-03-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In the OAuth2 Client extension before 0.4 for MediaWiki, a CSRF vulnerability exists due to the OAuth2 state parameter not being checked in the callback function. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13516 | 1 Osisoft | 1 Pi Web Api | 2023-03-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In OSIsoft PI Web API and prior, the affected product is vulnerable to a direct attack due to a cross-site request forgery protection setting that has not taken effect. | |||||
| CVE-2023-1033 | 1 Froxlor | 1 Froxlor | 2023-03-07 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository froxlor/froxlor prior to 2.0.11. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27295 | 1 Opencats | 1 Opencats | 2023-03-04 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site request forgery is facilitated by OpenCATS failure to require CSRF tokens in POST requests. An attacker can exploit this issue by creating a dummy page that executes Javascript in an authenticated user's session when visited. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34167 | 1 Taogogo | 1 Taocms | 2023-03-03 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in taoCMS 3.0.2 allows remote attackers to gain escalated privileges via taocms/admin/admin.php. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10884 | 1 Simple-membership-plugin | 1 Simple Membership | 2023-03-01 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The simple-membership plugin before 3.3.3 for WordPress has multiple CSRF issues. | |||||
| CVE-2016-15005 | 1 Golf Project | 1 Golf | 2023-02-28 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| CSRF tokens are generated using math/rand, which is not a cryptographically secure random number generator, allowing an attacker to predict values and bypass CSRF protections with relatively few requests. | |||||
