Total
987 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-20081 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 27 Android, Mt6580, Mt6735 and 24 more | 2022-04-18 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In A-GPS, there is a possible man in the middle attack due to improper certificate validation. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS06461919; Issue ID: ALPS06461919. | |||||
| CVE-2022-28352 | 1 Weechat | 1 Weechat | 2022-04-13 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| WeeChat (aka Wee Enhanced Environment for Chat) 3.2 to 3.4 before 3.4.1 does not properly verify the TLS certificate of the server, after certain GnuTLS options are changed, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof a TLS chat server via an arbitrary certificate. NOTE: this only affects situations where weechat.network.gnutls_ca_system or weechat.network.gnutls_ca_user is changed without a WeeChat restart. | |||||
| CVE-2022-0759 | 1 Redhat | 1 Kubeclient | 2022-04-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in all versions of kubeclient up to (but not including) v4.9.3, the Ruby client for Kubernetes REST API, in the way it parsed kubeconfig files. When the kubeconfig file does not configure custom CA to verify certs, kubeclient ends up accepting any certificate (it wrongly returns VERIFY_NONE). Ruby applications that leverage kubeclient to parse kubeconfig files are susceptible to Man-in-the-middle attacks (MITM). | |||||
| CVE-2021-45490 | 1 3cx | 1 3cx | 2022-04-04 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| The client applications in 3CX on Windows, the 3CX app for iOS, and the 3CX application for Android through 2022-03-17 lack SSL certificate validation. | |||||
| CVE-2022-0123 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2022-04-04 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| An issue has been discovered affecting GitLab versions prior to 14.4.5, between 14.5.0 and 14.5.3, and between 14.6.0 and 14.6.1. GitLab does not validate SSL certificates for some of external CI services which makes it possible to perform MitM attacks on connections to these external services. | |||||
| CVE-2022-27820 | 1 Owasp | 1 Zed Attack Proxy | 2022-03-31 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) through w2022-03-21 does not verify the TLS certificate chain of an HTTPS server. | |||||
| CVE-2022-21170 | 1 Daj | 6 Dspa-15000 M5, Dspa-2000 M4, Dspa-4000 M4 and 3 more | 2022-03-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| Improper check for certificate revocation in i-FILTER Ver.10.45R01 and earlier, i-FILTER Ver.9.50R10 and earlier, i-FILTER Browser & Cloud MultiAgent for Windows Ver.4.93R04 and earlier, and D-SPA (Ver.3 / Ver.4) using i-FILTER allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack and eavesdrop on an encrypted communication. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3698 | 2 Cockpit-project, Redhat | 2 Cockpit, Enterprise Linux | 2022-03-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Cockpit in versions prior to 260 in the way it handles the certificate verification performed by the System Security Services Daemon (SSSD). This flaw allows client certificates to authenticate successfully, regardless of the Certificate Revocation List (CRL) configuration or the certificate status. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2022-21657 | 1 Envoyproxy | 1 Envoy | 2022-03-07 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. In affected versions Envoy does not restrict the set of certificates it accepts from the peer, either as a TLS client or a TLS server, to only those certificates that contain the necessary extendedKeyUsage (id-kp-serverAuth and id-kp-clientAuth, respectively). This means that a peer may present an e-mail certificate (e.g. id-kp-emailProtection), either as a leaf certificate or as a CA in the chain, and it will be accepted for TLS. This is particularly bad when combined with the issue described in pull request #630, in that it allows a Web PKI CA that is intended only for use with S/MIME, and thus exempted from audit or supervision, to issue TLS certificates that will be accepted by Envoy. As a result Envoy will trust upstream certificates that should not be trusted. There are no known workarounds to this issue. Users are advised to upgrade. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23649 | 1 Sigstore | 1 Cosign | 2022-03-07 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| Cosign provides container signing, verification, and storage in an OCI registry for the sigstore project. Prior to version 1.5.2, Cosign can be manipulated to claim that an entry for a signature exists in the Rekor transparency log even if it doesn't. This requires the attacker to have pull and push permissions for the signature in OCI. This can happen with both standard signing with a keypair and "keyless signing" with Fulcio. If an attacker has access to the signature in OCI, they can manipulate cosign into believing the entry was stored in Rekor even though it wasn't. The vulnerability has been patched in v1.5.2 of Cosign. The `signature` in the `signedEntryTimestamp` provided by Rekor is now compared to the `signature` that is being verified. If these don't match, then an error is returned. If a valid bundle is copied to a different signature, verification should fail. Cosign output now only informs the user that certificates were verified if a certificate was in fact verified. There is currently no known workaround. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25638 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2022-03-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, certificate validation may be bypassed during attempted authentication by a TLS 1.3 client to a TLS 1.3 server. This occurs when the sig_algo field differs between the certificate_verify message and the certificate message. | |||||
| CVE-2022-21654 | 1 Envoyproxy | 1 Envoy | 2022-03-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. Envoy's tls allows re-use when some cert validation settings have changed from their default configuration. The only workaround for this issue is to ensure that default tls settings are used. Users are advised to upgrade. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29656 | 1 Pexip | 1 Infinity Connect | 2022-03-02 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Pexip Infinity Connect before 1.8.0 mishandles TLS certificate validation. The allow list is not properly checked. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22885 | 1 Hutool | 1 Hutool | 2022-02-25 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Hutool v5.7.18's HttpRequest was discovered to ignore all TLS/SSL certificate validation. | |||||
| CVE-2022-24968 | 1 Mellium | 1 Xmpp | 2022-02-22 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In Mellium mellium.im/xmpp through 0.21.0, an attacker capable of spoofing DNS TXT records can redirect a WebSocket connection request to a server under their control without causing TLS certificate verification to fail. This occurs because the wrong host name is selected during this verification. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20034 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 22 Android, Mt6580, Mt6735 and 19 more | 2022-02-11 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| In Preloader XFLASH, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to an improper certificate validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege for an attacker who has physical access to the device with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS06160806; Issue ID: ALPS06160806. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5824 | 1 Cerulean Studios | 1 Trillian | 2022-02-07 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Trillian 5.1.0.19 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-4831. | |||||
| CVE-2009-4831 | 1 Cerulean Studios | 1 Trillian | 2022-02-07 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cerulean Studios Trillian 3.1 Basic does not check SSL certificates during MSN authentication, which allows remote attackers to obtain MSN credentials via a man-in-the-middle attack with a spoofed SSL certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7234 | 1 Schneider-electric | 40 Ibp1110-1er, Ibp1110-1er Firmware, Ibp219-1er and 37 more | 2022-02-02 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability exists in Schneider Electric's Pelco Sarix Professional in all firmware versions prior to 3.29.67 which could allow arbitrary system file download due to lack of validation of SSL certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2012-3037 | 1 Siemens | 18 Simatic S7-1200, Simatic S7-1200 Cpu 1211c, Simatic S7-1200 Cpu 1211c Firmware and 15 more | 2022-02-01 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Siemens SIMATIC S7-1200 2.x PLC does not properly protect the private key of the SIMATIC CONTROLLER Certification Authority certificate, which allows remote attackers to spoof the S7-1200 web server by using this key to create a forged certificate. | |||||