Total
513 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-27170 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | 1.9 LOW | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.11.8. kernel/bpf/verifier.c performs undesirable out-of-bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic, leading to side-channel attacks that defeat Spectre mitigations and obtain sensitive information from kernel memory, aka CID-f232326f6966. This affects pointer types that do not define a ptr_limit. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26939 | 1 Bouncycastle | 2 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle, Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-fips-java-api | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC before 1.61 and BC-FJA before 1.0.1.2, attackers can obtain sensitive information about a private exponent because of Observable Differences in Behavior to Error Inputs. This occurs in org.bouncycastle.crypto.encodings.OAEPEncoding. Sending invalid ciphertext that decrypts to a short payload in the OAEP Decoder could result in the throwing of an early exception, potentially leaking some information about the private exponent of the RSA private key performing the encryption. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12402 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Mozilla and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Firefox and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | 1.2 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| During RSA key generation, bignum implementations used a variation of the Binary Extended Euclidean Algorithm which entailed significantly input-dependent flow. This allowed an attacker able to perform electromagnetic-based side channel attacks to record traces leading to the recovery of the secret primes. *Note:* An unmodified Firefox browser does not generate RSA keys in normal operation and is not affected, but products built on top of it might. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 78. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9495 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Freebsd and 3 more | 9 Debian Linux, Fedora, Freebsd and 6 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| The implementations of EAP-PWD in hostapd and wpa_supplicant are vulnerable to side-channel attacks as a result of cache access patterns. All versions of hostapd and wpa_supplicant with EAP-PWD support are vulnerable. The ability to install and execute applications is necessary for a successful attack. Memory access patterns are visible in a shared cache. Weak passwords may be cracked. Versions of hostapd/wpa_supplicant 2.7 and newer, are not vulnerable to the timing attack described in CVE-2019-9494. Both hostapd with EAP-pwd support and wpa_supplicant with EAP-pwd support prior to and including version 2.7 are affected. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9494 | 5 Fedoraproject, Freebsd, Opensuse and 2 more | 8 Fedora, Freebsd, Backports Sle and 5 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The implementations of SAE in hostapd and wpa_supplicant are vulnerable to side channel attacks as a result of observable timing differences and cache access patterns. An attacker may be able to gain leaked information from a side channel attack that can be used for full password recovery. Both hostapd with SAE support and wpa_supplicant with SAE support prior to and including version 2.7 are affected. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6651 | 1 F5 | 16 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 13 more | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In BIG-IP 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.1-11.6.4, BIG-IQ 7.0.0, 6.0.0-6.1.0,5.2.0-5.4.0, iWorkflow 2.3.0, and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, the Configuration utility login page may not follow best security practices when handling a malicious request. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3740 | 2 Dell, Oracle | 18 Bsafe Cert-j, Bsafe Crypto-j, Bsafe Ssl-j and 15 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during DSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover DSA keys. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3739 | 2 Dell, Oracle | 16 Bsafe Cert-j, Bsafe Crypto-j, Bsafe Ssl-j and 13 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1563 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very large number of messages to be decrypted, can recover a CMS/PKCS7 transported encryption key or decrypt any RSA encrypted message that was encrypted with the public RSA key, using a Bleichenbacher padding oracle attack. Applications are not affected if they use a certificate together with the private RSA key to the CMS_decrypt or PKCS7_decrypt functions to select the correct recipient info to decrypt. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s). | |||||
| CVE-2019-1559 | 13 Canonical, Debian, F5 and 10 more | 90 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager and 87 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q). | |||||
| CVE-2019-19805 | 1 Mfscripts | 1 Yetishare | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| _account_forgot_password.ajax.php in MFScripts YetiShare 3.5.2 through 4.5.3 takes a different amount of time to return depending on whether an email address is configured for the account name provided. This can be used by an attacker to enumerate accounts by guessing email addresses. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18887 | 2 Fedoraproject, Sensiolabs | 2 Fedora, Symfony | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Symfony 2.8.0 through 2.8.50, 3.4.0 through 3.4.34, 4.2.0 through 4.2.11, and 4.3.0 through 4.3.7. The UriSigner was subject to timing attacks. This is related to symfony/http-kernel. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16863 | 1 St | 8 St33tphf20i2c, St33tphf20i2c Firmware, St33tphf20spi and 5 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| STMicroelectronics ST33TPHF2ESPI TPM devices before 2019-09-12 allow attackers to extract the ECDSA private key via a side-channel timing attack because ECDSA scalar multiplication is mishandled, aka TPM-FAIL. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16782 | 3 Fedoraproject, Opensuse, Rack Project | 3 Fedora, Leap, Rack | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| There's a possible information leak / session hijack vulnerability in Rack (RubyGem rack). This vulnerability is patched in versions 1.6.12 and 2.0.8. Attackers may be able to find and hijack sessions by using timing attacks targeting the session id. Session ids are usually stored and indexed in a database that uses some kind of scheme for speeding up lookups of that session id. By carefully measuring the amount of time it takes to look up a session, an attacker may be able to find a valid session id and hijack the session. The session id itself may be generated randomly, but the way the session is indexed by the backing store does not use a secure comparison. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13684 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2023-11-07 | 2.6 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in JavaScript in Google Chrome prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13666 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Information leak in storage in Google Chrome prior to 77.0.3865.75 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13377 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The implementations of SAE and EAP-pwd in hostapd and wpa_supplicant 2.x through 2.8 are vulnerable to side-channel attacks as a result of observable timing differences and cache access patterns when Brainpool curves are used. An attacker may be able to gain leaked information from a side-channel attack that can be used for full password recovery. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10071 | 1 Apache | 1 Tapestry | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The code which checks HMAC in form submissions used String.equals() for comparisons, which results in a timing side channel for the comparison of the HMAC signatures. This could lead to remote code execution if an attacker is able to determine the correct signature for their payload. The comparison should be done with a constant time algorithm instead. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5407 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Nodejs and 4 more | 20 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Node.js and 17 more | 2023-11-07 | 1.9 LOW | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'. | |||||
| CVE-2018-3620 | 1 Intel | 8 Core I3, Core I5, Core I7 and 5 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.7 MEDIUM | 5.6 MEDIUM |
| Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and address translations may allow unauthorized disclosure of information residing in the L1 data cache to an attacker with local user access via a terminal page fault and a side-channel analysis. | |||||